Retirement Plan Myth-Busting, Part III

August 1, 2025

Retirement plans can be confusing. Between complex rules, industry jargon, and competing providers, it’s easy for employers to fall into patterns based on assumptions or half-truths. That’s why we created this series: to cut through the noise and help employers make confident, informed decisions. 


In this third installment, we’re addressing two persistent myths that often lead employers down the wrong path: the idea that payroll providers are the best place to get your plan, and the belief that robo-firms offer a hassle-free alternative. Spoiler: neither is as simple (nor as beneficial) as they seem. 

Myth #1:  It’s Easier to Just Get My Retirement Plan from My Payroll Provider 


At first glance, this one makes sense. You’re already working with a payroll provider, and they offer a 401(k) solution… why not bundle everything together? 


The problem: These plans are usually one-size-fits-all, offering only one, maybe two, types of plans, with limited flexibility and minimal strategic support. Payroll companies may market their bundled offering as “seamless,” but the behind-the-scenes reality is much more complicated. 


In most cases, the provider is not a retirement plan expert. Key services like compliance testing, plan design, and government filings may be outsourced to third parties. That means you’re relying on a patchwork of vendors—none of whom are accountable for the full picture. 


And it’s not just about service quality: it’s also about risk. When payroll and retirement plan administration are too closely bundled, errors in payroll data can cascade into serious compliance issues. Industry data shows that up to 90% of retirement plan issues stem from payroll-related errors, including incorrect deferral amounts, misclassified employees, and improperly excluded participants. 


These errors often go unnoticed until an audit or government filing deadline, by which point the cost of corrections—including penalties, interest, and potential legal exposure—can be substantial. In some cases, even minor payroll mistakes have led to disqualification risks or costly Voluntary Correction Program (VCP) filings with the IRS. 


The good news? You can still have seamless payroll integration without sacrificing plan quality. Many independent TPAs (Third Party Administrators), retirement plan consultants, and recordkeepers work with most major payroll providers and can link employee data electronically. You don’t have to trade convenience for quality—you can (and should) have both. 


Myth #2: Robo-Firms Are a Reasonable Choice for Plan Administration 


We get it. Automation can be attractive. The idea of a set-it-and-forget-it, low-cost retirement plan sounds great—especially for small businesses trying to manage overhead. But that simplicity often comes at a steep cost. 


Here’s the reality: Automation rarely means error-free.If things such as compliance deadlines, Form 5500 filings, or annual ADP/ACP testing are missed and your plan falls out of compliance, you could face costly corrections or penalties. 


And when something does go wrong? It’s often hard to reach someone and if you do, they are less likely to be someone who’s at all familiar with your plan. That’s a problem when you have questions, concerns, or a need for urgent guidance. 


What’s more, robo-plans are typically rigid and generic. There’s little room for customization, strategic design, or proactive tax planning; just a standard plan that may not actually align with your goals. 


 Final Thoughts 


A well-run retirement plan requires more than software and shortcuts—it needs expert oversight. While default options and robo-platforms may seem convenient, they often lead to limited results, missed opportunities, or costly penalties down the line. When challenges arise (and they will), you want a knowledgeable team in your corner—not a chatbot. 


Employers don’t have to settle for cookie-cutter solutions from payroll providers or impersonal platforms. With the right partners—dedicated experts who understand your business and your goals—you can build a plan that fits, supports your employees, and steers clear of expensive missteps. 


Don’t let myths guide your decisions. Get the expertise you deserve—and a plan that truly works for you. 

August 18, 2026
The Challenge A business owner came to us after receiving confusing news from their retirement plan actuary. Their Defined Benefit (Cash Balance) Plan had performed exceptionally well over several years; strong investment returns seemed to have created what’s called an overfunded Plan. While it seems like a positive name, an overfunded plan can create excessive and unexpected tax liabilities. So, their actuary recommended terminating the Plan by transferring the excess assets into the company's other Plan, a 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan, before eventually closing both Plans, a lengthy and complicated process.
July 15, 2026
As we wrap up the second quarter of 2026, one trend continues to stand out: retirement plans are becoming increasingly specialized. Whether driven by changing regulations, unique workforce structures, or evolving business goals, employers are finding that a one-size-fits-all approach simply doesn't work. This quarter, we explored the unique retirement plan challenges facing several industries—including medical and dental practices, construction companies, architecture and design firms, wineries, and California employers navigating CalSavers requirements. We also continued our series on the hidden risks of low-quality retirement plan services, highlighting how operational complexity, fragmented accountability, and misaligned incentives can create costs that extend far beyond administrative fees. For employers still evaluating their retirement plan options, we also discussed opportunities that many business owners overlook, including the ability to establish retirement plans after filing a tax extension and potentially generate meaningful tax savings. Below is a recap of the articles we published this quarter. We hope they provide practical insights to help you reduce risk, improve plan performance, and make more informed retirement plan decisions.
July 15, 2026
When considering retirement plans, employers in the private sector are often focused on designing a compliant plan that meets the needs of their owners and employees. While that process for private sector entities can certainly be complex, nonprofit organizations face an entirely different set of considerations, related to funding, staffing, governance, and organizational structure, to name just a few. From seasonal employees and grant-funded positions, to creative executive retention strategies and legacy retirement programs, to smaller budgets serving a mission, there is so much behind the scenes that can affect a nonprofit organization’s ideal retirement plan. At Primark Benefits, we've worked with nonprofit organizations of all sizes throughout our history, from large institutions with hundreds of participants to small community organizations with fewer than 20 employees. In addition, many members of our management team serve on nonprofit boards across the country for organizations and causes near and dear to their hearts. All that combined experience has validated what makes a retirement plan most successful: understanding the organization itself. 
More Posts