Q3 2025 Newsletter
October 7, 2025
At Primark Benefits, we’re committed to helping employers and advisors navigate the complexities of retirement plans with clarity and confidence. This quarter, we’ve published a range of new articles designed to inform, debunk misconceptions, and highlight opportunities—especially those that can still make a difference for this year. Next quarter, we'll be continuing our new How to "Break" a Retirement Plan Series and discussing other timely and important topics.
Here's What You Need to Know
Retirement plans can often feel like an alphabet soup of acronyms, mandates, and evolving state and federal laws. This series seeks to dispel common myths so employers can make better informed decisions. In previous articles, we’ve covered multiple myths at once. However, in Part IV, we’ll focus our efforts on one big misconception. Specifically, we’ll be talking about the idea that cookie-cutter, state-run programs such as CalSavers are “just as good” as custom-designed retirement plans, and the misunderstandings that persist about what state-run retirement programs do (and don’t) offer.
Welcome to our new series, How to “Break” a Retirement Plan, where we discuss what leads to a retirement plan being categorized as “broken,” ways to fix broken plans, and compliance tips for how to avoid a broken plan in the first place.
Updated December 31, 2025 Retirement plan catch-up contributions allow “older” workers—typically those age 50 and over— to set aside additional funds in their retirement accounts beyond standard annual limits. These extra contributions are an important planning tool for those nearing retirement who want to make up for earlier gaps in saving. Up
Retirement plans can be confusing. Between complex rules, industry jargon, and competing providers, it’s easy for employers to fall into patterns based on assumptions or half-truths. That’s why we created this series: to cut through the noise and help employers make confident, informed decisions. In this third installment, we’re addressing two persistent myths that often lead employers down the wrong path: the idea that payroll providers are the best place to get your plan, and the belief that robo-firms offer a hassle-free alternative. Spoiler: neither is as simple (nor as beneficial) as they seem.
Many companies, especially in the professional services sector—law firms, staffing agencies, engineering and consulting companies, healthcare groups, etc.—are often made up of various employee tiers. For example, in a given company, you might find partners or executives in one segment, professional staff in another, and support staff or hourly workers in yet another. While this tiered structure works well operationally, it can pose challenges relating to retirement plan compliance. In one recent example, the Primark Benefits team helped a client with over 3,500 employees overcome a complicated compliance issue by strategically changing the plan design, first expanding eligibility and then implementing automatic enrollment. Let’s take a look.
When evaluating retirement plan service providers, business leaders often evaluate pricing, overlooking the importance of quality, or service levels. Obvious service quality questions may include: How quickly can we expect a response when we have questions? Will questions be answered accurately the first time? Will the person responding be at all familiar with our particular plan(s), or will it be a general customer service agent? While these are important considerations in vendor selection decisions in many service industries, there’s an additional layer with retirement plan administration which is a fundamental reality: it is inherently complex. As we explore in the article below, that complexity makes operational errors not just possible, but likely, as proactive oversight is typically not found with low-cost, low-quality retirement plan service providers.
Most business owners focus most of their attention on revenue and growth, thinking about taxes only when necessary. Yet the structure of a business plays a pivotal role in retirement planning, influencing contribution limits, deductions, and long-term outcomes. Understanding the relationship between entity type and retirement planning is critical to maximizing contributions, deductions, and long-term retirement income.
For many employers, payroll is the operational backbone of the organization. It touches compensation, taxes, benefits, and reporting—so it’s understandable why retirement plans are often bundled there as well. If payroll providers offer a 401(k) solution, it can feel efficient to keep everything under one roof. But efficiency in payroll processing is not the same as effectiveness in retirement plan administration. As retirement plan regulations grow more complex—particularly under SECURE 2.0—many plan sponsors are discovering that payroll platforms simply weren’t designed to handle the interpretive, judgment-based responsibilities required to administer a qualified retirement plan.