Why Do So Many Non-profits Have the Wrong Type of Retirement Plan?

January 5, 2026

There are an estimated two million non-profit organizations in the U.S.  This includes public charities, private foundations, and other types of organizations, such as schools and religious institutions. These entities operate under different tax laws and structures than for-profit companies do. 

Because non-profit employees tend to receive lower salaries than their for-profit counterparts, non-profit organizations often try to provide enhanced employee benefit packages. The 403(b) plan was created in 1958 as one way to enable employees of non-profits to more effectively save. 

 

Despite the fact that it has been around for almost 70 years, the 403(b) plan goes largely unnoticed by many financial professionals, who are often unaware of the many advantages for non-profit organizations. Payroll companies, for example, and bundled retirement plan providers often stick to and recommend what they’re most comfortable with, which is the ubiquitous 401(k). 

 

This is why many non-profits end up providing a 401(k) plan to their employees. But just because a plan is “convenient” or “familiar” for the retirement plan provider doesn’t mean it’s the right fit for the organizations who use them or the individuals they employ. 

 

What Gets Missed When a Non-profit Is Placed into a 401(k)  

 

For retirement plan providers managing thousands of client plans, offering a single type of plan, such as a 401(k), is efficient for the provider. However, that one-size-fits-all approach causes clients to miss out on the flexibility and advantages a 403(b) plan is designed to provide. 

 

Non-profits have unique considerations, such as budget limits, workforce turnover, leadership compensation, and programmatic priorities. 403(b) plans are specifically designed for non-profits and offer significant advantages and options not in a 401k) plan. 

 Even if a 401(k) works operationally, it can leave non-profits without the full range of advantages specifically designed for them, with real financial consequences for both employers and employees. Some of the key benefits often overlooked include: 

 

1. Fewer Tests Required   
401(k) plans are subject to nondiscrimination tests, such as the Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) test. When a plan fails any of these tests, employers need to take corrective actions, sometimes including refunding their employees’ retirement plan contributions. This is often a time-consuming, frustrating process, especially for employees who were planning to avail themselves of the tax advantages inherent in making plan contributions. 


Because 403(b) plans are regulated differently than 401(k) plans, they don’t require ADP tests. This allows non-profit employees to contribute up to the annual limit without triggering corrective actions. 

 

2. Not Subject to Top-Heavy Rules 

When an organization has a 401(k) and their officers hold more than 60% of the plan’s assets, the plan becomes what’s called “top heavy”. This designation may require an employer to make contributions for additional employees in order to no longer test as top heavy. 

 

On the other hand, 403(b) plans are not subject to top-heavy rules, reducing potential compliance surprises for smaller nonprofits. 

 

3. Enhanced Catch-Up Opportunities 

Since many non-profit leaders earn less than they could in the private sector, saving for retirement can be more challenging. In recognition of that, certain 403(b) plans allow for special catch-up contributions that are unavailable in 401(k)s. 

 

4. Penalties Often Do Not Apply 

For a variety of reasons, late payroll deposits are a common occurrence for many organizations, both for- and non-profit. In a 401(k), they usually trigger excise taxes and IRS filings. 

 

Though non-profits that sponsor 403(b) plans do not pay excise taxes, some providers still apply the same correction process, either out of habit or lack of knowledge, therefore charging their clients needless fees that do not apply to them. 

 

Starting With the Right Question 

 

What this all boils down to is that choosing a retirement plan should not start with what is easiest to administer - it should start by asking, “Who is the employer?”. 

 

For non-profits, this means considering tax-exempt status, compensation realities, and the needs of mission-driven staff. When that conversation happens first, 403(b) plans often emerge as a better fit. 

 

If your non-profit ended up with a 401(k), it may be time to reexamine. 403(b)s exist for a reason: they offer flexibility and advantages designed specifically for non-profit organizations. 

November 24, 2025
As we approach the end of the year, it’s time for employers, plan sponsors, and participants to review the new retirement plan limits for 2026. Each year, the IRS updates the thresholds for contributions, compensation, and catch-up amounts to account for inflation and statutory changes. Staying on top of these numbers is critical for plan compliance, participant communications, and overall retirement strategy.
November 6, 2025
The Roth Catch-Up Trap: What High Earners Need to Know New rules can create costly surprises for older employees.
October 23, 2025
Welcome back to our series, How to “Break” a Retirement Plan” In Part I , we examined structural mistakes—the foundational missteps in plan design, contribution handling, and payroll processes that can quietly set a plan on the wrong path. Part II focused on operational blind spots, showing how day-to-day execution errors, from auto-enrollment missteps to mishandling former employees’ accounts, can derail even a well-designed plan. Now, in Part III, we turn our attention to what happens when the IRS takes a closer look. When a retirement plan is audited, the IRS isn’t searching for obscure loopholes; it’s looking for a familiar set of recurring problems. These are the same types of errors that often start small but can grow into significant compliance issues. Understanding where auditors tend to focus can help plan sponsors stay ahead of “issues” before they become “findings”.
More Posts