Why Do So Many Non-profits Have the Wrong Type of Retirement Plan?

January 5, 2026

There are an estimated two million non-profit organizations in the U.S.  This includes public charities, private foundations, and other types of organizations, such as schools and religious institutions. These entities operate under different tax laws and structures than for-profit companies do. 

Because non-profit employees tend to receive lower salaries than their for-profit counterparts, non-profit organizations often try to provide enhanced employee benefit packages. The 403(b) plan was created in 1958 as one way to enable employees of non-profits to more effectively save. 

 

Despite the fact that it has been around for almost 70 years, the 403(b) plan goes largely unnoticed by many financial professionals, who are often unaware of the many advantages for non-profit organizations. Payroll companies, for example, and bundled retirement plan providers often stick to and recommend what they’re most comfortable with, which is the ubiquitous 401(k). 

 

This is why many non-profits end up providing a 401(k) plan to their employees. But just because a plan is “convenient” or “familiar” for the retirement plan provider doesn’t mean it’s the right fit for the organizations who use them or the individuals they employ. 

 

What Gets Missed When a Non-profit Is Placed into a 401(k)  

 

For retirement plan providers managing thousands of client plans, offering a single type of plan, such as a 401(k), is efficient for the provider. However, that one-size-fits-all approach causes clients to miss out on the flexibility and advantages a 403(b) plan is designed to provide. 

 

Non-profits have unique considerations, such as budget limits, workforce turnover, leadership compensation, and programmatic priorities. 403(b) plans are specifically designed for non-profits and offer significant advantages and options not in a 401k) plan. 

 Even if a 401(k) works operationally, it can leave non-profits without the full range of advantages specifically designed for them, with real financial consequences for both employers and employees. Some of the key benefits often overlooked include: 

 

1. Fewer Tests Required   
401(k) plans are subject to nondiscrimination tests, such as the Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) test. When a plan fails any of these tests, employers need to take corrective actions, sometimes including refunding their employees’ retirement plan contributions. This is often a time-consuming, frustrating process, especially for employees who were planning to avail themselves of the tax advantages inherent in making plan contributions. 


Because 403(b) plans are regulated differently than 401(k) plans, they don’t require ADP tests. This allows non-profit employees to contribute up to the annual limit without triggering corrective actions. 

 

2. Not Subject to Top-Heavy Rules 

When an organization has a 401(k) and their officers hold more than 60% of the plan’s assets, the plan becomes what’s called “top heavy”. This designation may require an employer to make contributions for additional employees in order to no longer test as top heavy. 

 

On the other hand, 403(b) plans are not subject to top-heavy rules, reducing potential compliance surprises for smaller nonprofits. 

 

3. Enhanced Catch-Up Opportunities 

Since many non-profit leaders earn less than they could in the private sector, saving for retirement can be more challenging. In recognition of that, certain 403(b) plans allow for special catch-up contributions that are unavailable in 401(k)s. 

 

4. Penalties Often Do Not Apply 

For a variety of reasons, late payroll deposits are a common occurrence for many organizations, both for- and non-profit. In a 401(k), they usually trigger excise taxes and IRS filings. 

 

Though non-profits that sponsor 403(b) plans do not pay excise taxes, some providers still apply the same correction process, either out of habit or lack of knowledge, therefore charging their clients needless fees that do not apply to them. 

 

Starting With the Right Question 

 

What this all boils down to is that choosing a retirement plan should not start with what is easiest to administer - it should start by asking, “Who is the employer?”. 

 

For non-profits, this means considering tax-exempt status, compensation realities, and the needs of mission-driven staff. When that conversation happens first, 403(b) plans often emerge as a better fit. 

 

If your non-profit ended up with a 401(k), it may be time to reexamine. 403(b)s exist for a reason: they offer flexibility and advantages designed specifically for non-profit organizations. 

August 18, 2026
The Challenge A business owner came to us after receiving confusing news from their retirement plan actuary. Their Defined Benefit (Cash Balance) Plan had performed exceptionally well over several years; strong investment returns seemed to have created what’s called an overfunded Plan. While it seems like a positive name, an overfunded plan can create excessive and unexpected tax liabilities. So, their actuary recommended terminating the Plan by transferring the excess assets into the company's other Plan, a 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan, before eventually closing both Plans, a lengthy and complicated process.
July 15, 2026
As we wrap up the second quarter of 2026, one trend continues to stand out: retirement plans are becoming increasingly specialized. Whether driven by changing regulations, unique workforce structures, or evolving business goals, employers are finding that a one-size-fits-all approach simply doesn't work. This quarter, we explored the unique retirement plan challenges facing several industries—including medical and dental practices, construction companies, architecture and design firms, wineries, and California employers navigating CalSavers requirements. We also continued our series on the hidden risks of low-quality retirement plan services, highlighting how operational complexity, fragmented accountability, and misaligned incentives can create costs that extend far beyond administrative fees. For employers still evaluating their retirement plan options, we also discussed opportunities that many business owners overlook, including the ability to establish retirement plans after filing a tax extension and potentially generate meaningful tax savings. Below is a recap of the articles we published this quarter. We hope they provide practical insights to help you reduce risk, improve plan performance, and make more informed retirement plan decisions.
July 15, 2026
When considering retirement plans, employers in the private sector are often focused on designing a compliant plan that meets the needs of their owners and employees. While that process for private sector entities can certainly be complex, nonprofit organizations face an entirely different set of considerations, related to funding, staffing, governance, and organizational structure, to name just a few. From seasonal employees and grant-funded positions, to creative executive retention strategies and legacy retirement programs, to smaller budgets serving a mission, there is so much behind the scenes that can affect a nonprofit organization’s ideal retirement plan. At Primark Benefits, we've worked with nonprofit organizations of all sizes throughout our history, from large institutions with hundreds of participants to small community organizations with fewer than 20 employees. In addition, many members of our management team serve on nonprofit boards across the country for organizations and causes near and dear to their hearts. All that combined experience has validated what makes a retirement plan most successful: understanding the organization itself. 
More Posts