Beyond the Basics: Retirement Plan Considerations Unique to Nonprofit Organizations

July 15, 2026

When considering retirement plans, employers in the private sector are often focused on designing a compliant plan that meets the needs of their owners and employees. While that process for private sector entities can certainly be complex, nonprofit organizations face an entirely different set of considerations, related to funding, staffing, governance, and organizational structure, to name just a few. From seasonal employees and grant-funded positions, to creative executive retention strategies and legacy retirement programs, to smaller budgets serving a mission, there is so much behind the scenes that can affect a nonprofit organization’s ideal retirement plan. 


At Primark Benefits, we've worked with nonprofit organizations of all sizes throughout our history, from large institutions with hundreds of participants to small community organizations with fewer than 20 employees. In addition, many members of our management team serve on nonprofit boards across the country for organizations and causes near and dear to their hearts. All that combined experience has validated what makes a retirement plan most successful: understanding the organization itself.

Like Snowflakes, Every Nonprofit’s Workforce Is Unique 


Nonprofits often have highly diverse employee populations. Depending on the organization, a workforce may include: 


  • Seasonal employees 
  • Part-time staff 
  • Residential or live-in employees 
  • Union employees 
  • Grant-funded positions 
  • Multiple locations or divisions 
  • Highly compensated executives alongside large numbers of hourly employees 

These workforce differences can have a significant impact on retirement plan design. 


For example, participant eligibility requirements, employer contribution formulas, hours-of-service rules, and vesting schedules all need to be carefully considered to achieve the organization's goals and keep the plan compliant with IRS and ERISA requirements. 


 An optimal design can help provide meaningful retirement benefits for long-term employees without unintentionally creating additional cost or administrative complexity. 


403(b) Plans Are Flexible ...When Designed Correctly 



We previously published an article about why nonprofit organizations are often incorrectly placed into 401(k) plans instead of 403(b) plans. While we believe that most nonprofits should be in a 403(b), many organizations assume that every 403(b) plan is designed and operates in the same way. In reality, there is considerable flexibility. 


Some organizations choose simple, employee deferral-only arrangements. Others provide matching contributions or discretionary employer contributions. Larger organizations may have multiple benefit objectives that require more sophisticated plan design. 


The key? Making sure the plan reflects the organization's workforce, budget, and long-term objectives, rather than relying on a generic template. 


Executive Benefits Often Require Additional Planning 


Nonprofit leaders face many of the same retirement planning challenges as their peers in the private sector. They frequently want the opportunity to save beyond the standard 403(b) limits; in turn, organizations want to be competitive when recruiting and retaining that leadership, by offering attractive benefits packages. 


In some situations, organizations may find it advantageous to addi supplemental retirement programs, such as eligible 457(b) plans, for select management and / or other highly compensated employees (HCEs). Others may explore cash balance or other defined benefit plans when appropriate. 


While these strategies require specialized administration and careful coordination, they can become valuable tools for executive recruitment and retention. 


Legacy Plans Can Create Unexpected Complexity 


On the other hand, many nonprofits in the U.S. have retirement plans that have evolved over decades. 


Some of them have transitioned from defined benefit pensions to defined contribution plans. Others have inherited multiple plans following mergers, organizational restructuring, or changes in tax status. Some continue to administer legacy provisions that no longer fit the organization's current needs. 


These situations often require thoughtful analysis rather than simply maintaining the status quo. 


Our team has helped non-profit organizations in many ways, from evaluating existing plan structures, consolidating plans where appropriate, transitioning from older arrangements, and modernizing plan administration, all while preserving compliance throughout the process. 


Compliance Doesn't Have to Be Overwhelming 


As nonprofits grow, many aspects of the operations become more complex. Retirement plan administration is no different. 


For example, an organization may eventually require independent plan audits, expanded reporting, or more sophisticated compliance testing. Others discover that prior administrators failed to complete required filings or perform testing correctly, leaving years of corrections to address. 


These situations can feel overwhelming—but they are far from uncommon. 


Experience Across the Nonprofit Community 


Over the years, we've worked with a wide range of nonprofit organizations, including: 

  • Educational organizations 
  • Camps and youth programs 
  • Arts and cultural institutions and museums 
  • Religious organizations 
  • Human service agencies 
  • Community foundations 
  • Healthcare and support organizations 
  • Environmental organizations 


Although their missions differ, they often face many of the same retirement plan challenges. 


Understanding those challenges allows us to recommend practical solutions that fit the organization's goals instead of forcing every nonprofit into the same model. 


Our team has regularly assisted organizations with: 


Audit preparation and auditor coordination 

  • Compliance testing 
  • Correcting historical plan issues 
  • Late or amended filings 
  • Operational corrections 
  • Ongoing administrative support 


Our goal is for organizations to move beyond reacting to compliance issues, to instead maintain a plan that is organized, well-documented, and audit-ready year after year. 


A Retirement Plan That Supports Your Mission 


Your retirement plan(s) should support your organization's mission—not become a distraction from it. 


Whether you're evaluating your first 403(b), modernizing an existing plan, adding executive retirement benefits, or simply looking for more responsive administration, choosing a partner with nonprofit experience can make a meaningful difference. 


At Primark Benefits, nonprofit organizations aren't a niche—we've been helping them navigate retirement plan complexities for decades. Our team understands that every organization has unique goals, unique employees, and unique challenges. We're here to tailor a retirement program that supports all three. 

July 2, 2026
The Mega Backdoor Roth strategy has become one of the most talked-about retirement planning techniques in recent years. Financial publications regularly highlight its potential to help participants contribute far more than the standard deferral limits allow. However, while the strategy can be extremely valuable, an important limitation is often overlooked: due to nondiscrimination testing requirements, some employer-sponsored retirement plans may prevent certain participants from taking full advantage of it. Before assuming a Mega Backdoor Roth will work in your plan, it is important to understand how the strategy operates—and where it can run into trouble.
June 4, 2026
For years, many California employers viewed CalSavers as something they would “deal with later.” As the state gradually rolled out mandatory retirement program deadlines based on employer size, it was easy for smaller businesses to push the issue down the road. Now, those deadlines have passed, the employee headcount threshold is now ONE— and enforcement is becoming very real.
May 12, 2026
In Part I of this series , we explored how differences in retirement plan service models can influence risks related to compliance, oversight, and fiduciary areas. In Part II, the focus shifts to a more concrete question: How do these differences ultimately affect the total cost of maintaining a retirement plan over time? While administrative fees are often the most visible expense, they represent only a portion of a plan’s true cost. The broader financial impact—what is often referred to as total cost of ownership—includes the downstream effects of operational efficiency, compliance accuracy, and the ability to fully utilize the plan’s design. 
More Posts