Super Catch-Up Contributions under Secure 2.0: Enhanced Retirement Savings Opportunities

Jennifer Risi • February 18, 2025

Primark Benefits is continually monitoring legislative updates. As such, we are sharing this reminder about the “super catch-up" contributions available under The SECURE 2.0 Act, in effect as of the start of 2025. 

The SECURE 2.0 Act has significantly altered retirement savings regulations. Among its many changes, the Act has: 


  • Increased the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age,
  • Expanded access to 401(k) plans for Long-Term Part-Time workers,
  • Enhanced catch-up contributions for certain older adults. 


Traditionally, Congress has set participant deferral limits for retirement savings plans such as 401(k), 403(b), and other employer-sponsored plans. For 2025, the standard deferral limit is $23,500. 


Individuals aged 50 and older have been allowed even more, additional catch-up contributions to enhance their retirement savings. In 2025, eligible individuals can contribute an extra $7,500, bringing the total contribution limit for individuals aged 50 and older to $31,000. 


“Super Catch-Up" Provision 


To further encourage retirement savings, Congress introduced an enhanced, or "super catch-up", provision under Secure 2.0, for individuals 60-63 years old. That limit is the greater of: 


  • $10,000, or
  • 150% of the standard age 50+ catch-up contribution limit. 


For 2025, the IRS has set the age 50+ catch-up limit at $7,500. Therefore, for 2025, individuals aged 60 through 63 will be eligible to contribute an extra $11,250 annually, bringing the total contribution limit for those individuals to $34,750. 


The introduction of super catch-up contributions under the SECURE 2.0 Act provides an excellent opportunity for older workers to boost their retirement savings. By allowing individuals aged 60-63 to contribute significantly more than their younger counterparts, these provisions help maximize tax-advantaged retirement funds. 


Primark Benefits is continually monitoring legislative updates and has a page on our website dedicated to the changes being implemented annually from Secure 2.0. 


October 23, 2025
Welcome back to our series, How to “Break” a Retirement Plan” In Part I , we examined structural mistakes—the foundational missteps in plan design, contribution handling, and payroll processes that can quietly set a plan on the wrong path. Part II focused on operational blind spots, showing how day-to-day execution errors, from auto-enrollment missteps to mishandling former employees’ accounts, can derail even a well-designed plan. Now, in Part III, we turn our attention to what happens when the IRS takes a closer look. When a retirement plan is audited, the IRS isn’t searching for obscure loopholes; it’s looking for a familiar set of recurring problems. These are the same types of errors that often start small but can grow into significant compliance issues. Understanding where auditors tend to focus can help plan sponsors stay ahead of “issues” before they become “findings”.
October 7, 2025
At Primark Benefits, we’re committed to helping employers and advisors navigate the complexities of retirement plans with clarity and confidence. This quarter, we’ve published a range of new articles designed to inform, debunk misconceptions, and highlight opportunities—especially those that can still make a difference for this year. Next quarter, we'll be continuing our new How to "Break" a Retirement Plan Series and discussing other timely and important topics.
October 7, 2025
Operational blind spots that often (or can) trip up plan sponsors Welcome back to our series, How to "Break" a Retirement Plan." In Part I , we explored the structural missteps that often set a plan on the wrong path from day one, such as choosing the wrong type of plan, mishandling contributions, and payroll errors. While getting the foundation right is critical, even the strongest plan can unravel if daily operations aren’t tightly managed. The rules are strict, and mistakes (no matter how seemingly small, or well-intentioned!) can trigger costly corrections or even regulatory scrutiny.
More Posts